Monday, 21 November 2016

Renewable opportunity from carbon pricing setback, Whse Star, 21 Nov. 2016

Renewable opportunity from carbon pricing setback

In her column “U.S. bombshell need not be a curse for Trudeau”, Chantal Hebert had examined cross-border opportunities and challenges such as having to rethink carbon pricing in Canada. 

She overlooked a potential for increased Canadian competitiveness from sustainable economies during a Donald Trump presidency.

Carbon pricing has a track record of subsidizing fossil expansions and for framing a status quo to slow down long-overdue renewable infrastructure initiatives. 

Let’s not be fooled and oiled by the good cop, bad cop routine of carbon pricers, like Exxon Mobile CEO Rex Tillerson or B.C. Premier Christy Clark and their support crew of Flat-Earthers, climate deniers.

We should have stepped out of carbon price magical thinking already and put the shoulder to the wheel of profitable renewable energy production and export such as from wind power.

Suppressed rights and freedoms, as well as deeply wounded economic and ecological justice, have a way of reasserting themselves destructively.

The resentment that brought Trump into the White House has a regressive flavour beyond the frequent confederate flags at his rallies, harkening back to another troubled changeover in energy economies.

Borrowing from Leonard Cohen’s title for his poetry collection The Energy of Slaves, Calgary journalist and author Andrew Nikiforuk named his book on the political unpleasantries of petro-oriented economies like Canada The Energy of Slaves: Oil and the new Servitude.

Staying in Nikiforuk’s analogy, we can use for a moment the Mason-Dixon line along the Ohio River that once had separated northern states from a South where slavery was legal, to better visualize modern divisions between outdated and appropriate energy initiatives. 

French writer Alexis de Tocqueville travelled widely in the U.S., and his observations from 1831 deliver a warning from history: 

“On the north bank of the Ohio, everything is activity, industry. Labour is honoured, there are no slaves.

“Pass to the south bank and there appear changes so suddenly that you think yourself on the other side of the world. The enterprising spirit is gone.”

Canada can push back economic weakness and lower emissions, without B.C.-type carbon accounting fraud, and thrive with resilience as industrial society.

With the Trumpists in charge of the White House, Congress, Senate and soon the U.S. Supreme Court, the opening Canadian opportunity is logically not in unconventional oil and gas expansion, but in renewable development.

Perhaps this means energizing the 49th parallel not as wall but as quasi Mason-Dixon-inspired demarcation of Canadian independence going hand-in-hand with sustainable players in North America and beyond.

Peter Becker
Energy consultant
Whitehorse

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

U.S. result was predictable months ago (Whitehorse Star, Nov. 9, 2016)

U.S. result was predictable months ago (Whitehorse Star, Nov. 9, 2016)

Re.“Clintonomics created Trump; only Sanders can beat him” (Star column, June 17, 2016). 

Quality journalism is often published in the Star. If you can’t find it in your newspaper stack or in the Star online archives, just go to:

http://yukonblogger.blogspot.com/2016/06/clintonomics-created-trump-only-sanders.html or simply google yukonblogger. 

Seriously, many who are not sucked or plugged into the neoliberal echo chambers of mainstream media like the CBC, or the U.S. equivalents National Public Radio and CNN, etc., could see Trump coming.

Independent American authors and journalists, among them Barbara Ehrenreich and Thomas Frank, through months and years, had warned and left little doubt that people needed revenge on the elites and were going to get it.

Ehrenreich and Frank are a joy to read; they are that good. Also, one comes along much better prepared for what happens and when it happens.

Their wisdom inspired me to write the opinion piece for the Star, which I feel has become even more relevant.

Peter Becker
Whitehorse

Carbon tax commands no GST like compliance (Whitehorse Star column Nov. 8, 2016)

Carbon tax commands no GST like compliance (Whitehorse Star column Nov. 8, 2016)

Nobody asks for a carbon tax from renewable energy drivers Denmark or Germany, where carbon pricing is a joke, so they would live up to Paris and previous climate agreements.

Similarly, the announcement for a federal carbon tax has its specifics so far spelled out in the Vancouver Declaration which requires greenhouse gas-reducing actions, but not carbon pricing.

The heavy climate lifting lies in infrastructure reform from which substantial behaviour change can follow.

One can only get on an electric transit bus, like in Winnipeg, if it’s there.

Carbon pricing puts the cart before the horse, in the all-important problem awareness, to prevent such improvements.

The climate survival crisis is a global one and renewables climate action that is for real breaks the bind of the carbon tax shell game scientifically, morally and also legally.

There is broad precedence building internationally but also nationally, where many of the First Nations in Canada have taken a lead in the Canadian climate discourse by denouncing the emission-increasing, pipeline-pushing fraud of carbon pricing.

The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report part 3, with input from thousands of scientists, spells it out clearly that carbon pricing has never worked anywhere.

But it acknowledges that a regionally adaptive diversity of renewable energy frameworks and ecological agriculture reforms have proven more than emission reductions, even carbon sequestration success.

A new generation of First Nation leaders is especially tough-minded and brilliant, and have evolved from uphill struggles for justice where they could never afford to be scholarly illiterate like streamlined political elites.

Universalism of the oil status quo/carbon pricing kind always was a mark of empire ideologies. French, British, German, Dutch, American, Roman, Persian, Mongol and Spanish empires projected one and one only concept of marching, dinner etiquette, economics, power structure, etc.

The non-Western learning understands this very well, and the Global South overwhelmingly rejects carbon pricing as frozen group think levied by undemocratic fossil cartels and morbid financial speculators.

Not everybody supports a sales tax, but its revenue-collecting purpose is widely understood or agreed upon.

Whereas a carbon tax is climate-counterproductive, politically divisive and legally self-combusting, as it offends a sense of evidence based thinking.

Peter Becker is a Whitehorse energy consultant.

Friday, 28 October 2016

Electric mail delivery fleet lowers energy costs, gases (Whse Star. Oct. 27, 2016)

Electric mail delivery fleet lowers energy costs, gases (Whse Star. Oct. 27, 2016)

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
A long overdue initiative for electric road transportation is here, and its perspectives pack punch for meeting Vancouver declaration and Paris agreement requirements.

The first part of this two-part commentary, published Tuesday, summarized the back story of energy economics.

A Yukon Party media release of Oct. 17: “This investment of $160,000 will allow the purchase of four electric vehicles and the installation of eight charging stations throughout Whitehorse (some open to public use).”

It is the first concrete climate/energy deliverable of the election campaign.

Coming from the Yukon Party, this may surprise some.

However, it is not so much on the strength of their overall platform that the initiative shines, but it’s helped by the feebleness of the carbon price talk from the opposition parties.

Electric vehicle batteries hold a key for storing energy on the grid through the use of eventually bi-directional chargers as well as for lowering the energy cost of doing business in the community.

Highway fast charge points are the logical follow-up that people will demand.

Helping soon is the close, hands-on visibility of these electric trucks or vans and cars that run on 15 per cent energy and 20 per cent of fuel costs and 10 per cent of maintenance cost of equivalent combustion-powered vehicles.

The carbon tax claim to add a price signal of five or 50 per cent on top of the better than 500 per cent renewable fuel advantage is as false as it sounds.

The carbon pricing myth of viable fossil fuel into the long future is being busted wide open.

Coincidentally, carbon price advocating organizations like the Yukon Conservation Society and the Yukon NDP have often marginalized discussing EV policy options.

They might not realize how much their ecological aspirations have been and especially will be shackled to carbon pricing agendas of the fossil resource industry, locally and beyond.

Unfortunately, widely reported fracking slushfund operations under the cover of B.C. carbon tax refunds have never been denounced by these carbon price advocates who in fact praise the B.C. carbon tax as model.

A disturbing backdrop to the five priorities of the 2011 NDP election platform, which never even mentioned the word energy, creating an invitation, a vacuum that was filled by the Yukon Party with fracking and LNG proposals.

“Putting a price on carbon,” as if there was none, taunts the cord woodcutter who is trying to make it with an old pickup truck and the single mom with an empty gas tank.

Intentionally or not, the annual carbon tax refund, if it was for real, which it isn’t, laughs at the many families who live from paycheque to paycheque.

First Nations from northern B.C. to Treaty 3 lands in Ontario say no to carbon pricing, as it is an ideological bulldozer for pipelines they don’t want.

The Indigenous Environmental Network, likewise to the G-77 developing Nations in Paris, rejected this renewed and racialized finance colonialism.

Developing and First Nations are working toward renewable energy leapfrogging because it is economically and environmentally more realistic than the status quo nickle-and-diming by the carbon price to subsidize unconventional oil and gas expansion.

The tricky carbon tax title automatically locks in the expansion of emitter rights and free emission permits for carbon off-set traders, wherever there is a carbon tax from B.C. to Alberta (by 2017) to Australia (until 2014), Sweden and the U.K., for the purpose of capping emission reductions.

The energy policy study tour NDP Leader Liz Hanson participated in and reported on was offered by the German diplomatic service to Paris conference participants.

It centred around the effects of the EEG from 1999, the successful renewable energy source legislation she never mentioned and which had to fight its way against carbon tax lobbyists who tried and still try to stop it. She should know better than technocratic same old.

J. R. Saul observes in his book The Comeback (of aboriginal peoples) in the chapter History Is Upon Us:

“But the key to dealing with a real crisis, one that goes beyond our personal realities, lies in our ability to move outside what we think of as normal.

“If the crisis is big enough, we have to reconsider the narrative or we can be destroyed by it.”

The electric vehicle initiative is striking as the carbon price lobby of the oil cartel fights hardest to defend a 95 per cent control of the transportation sector.

Premier Darrell Pasloski’s statement that carbon pricing does not work in the North does not go far enough because it does not work – period.

Peter Becker is a Whitehorse energy consultant.

By Peter Becker

Carbon pricing is counterproductive to climate/energy realities (comment Whse Star Oct. 25, 2016)

Carbon pricing is counterproductive to climate/energy realities (comment Whse Star Oct. 25, 2016)

Conventional oil production, which generates or underwrites almost all of the profits, usable net energy output and economic vitality of the global, fossil energy-based economy, has been declining since 2005.

For the simple reason of real economic strength being in decline, actually below phoney GDP growth figures, picking up adequate pace of a renewable energy transition is more difficult now than it was a decade ago.

And it will be harder yet 10 years from now to, for example, push for an overdue wind power expansion.

The high carbon price, if that was a valid term, which it isn’t, or better too high fossil energy costs, is already siphoning off more and more of renewably needed investment.

That is particularly out of sync because wind energy long held the technological maturity to deliver the crucially necessary wealth from affordable, very high net energy output that oil-gushing wells once had until around 1960.

Carbon pricing mechanisms in their real effect subsidize a status quo of unaffordable, unconventional oil and gas expansion and emission increases.

However, even if the carbon price advocacy of slow change held water, it still shows how fundamentally out of touch a carbon tax is with the accelerating pace of change in climate and energy realities.

Growing greenhouse gases, other pollution and increasing financial debts have converged.

High pollution levels increasingly mirror a lot of unconventional extractive process intensity that expends vast financial, energy and mineral resources.

The deadliest bottleneck of energy transition is not an also very important home heating need, but transportation, which is currently 95 per cent oil-dependent.

That includes the often overlooked running of farm tractors that are crucial for food production, locally or otherwise.

Inviting minimum enviro-impact, high energy and profit outputting wind power, similar to Bear Mountain Wind Park in Dawson Creek, B.C., is a no-brainer. But the electric transportation initiative is equally pressing.

Part two of this commentary, to be published later this week, will reflect on the first concrete climate/energy deliverable of the 2016 Yukon election campaign to bring on an electric mail delivery fleet, including charge stations available to the public.

Peter Becker is a Whitehorse energy consultant.

By Peter Becker

Friday, 14 October 2016

Yukoners Concerned is trapped in 21 recommendations (Whse Star Comment Oct. 14, 2016)

Yukoners Concerned is trapped in 21 recommendations (Whse Star Comment Oct. 14, 2016)

Almost two years from the release of the legislature’s fracking committee’s report, Don Roberts continues to misread its 21 recommendations on their face value; green-washing recommendation which converge onto a one-way frack-lane.

In his otherwise mostly acceptable letter to the Star on Oct. 12, Mr. Roberts again asked the Yukon government to fulfil or apply these 21 recommendations, as if they advocated honest environmental protections.

Unlike Mr. Roberts, I have repeatedly questioned the frack report and have not bought into it, thereby also avoiding lending false legitimacy for fracking, which was the purpose of the report to begin with:

“The committee did agree that the following [21] recommendations should be addressed before hydraulic fracturing is considered.”

Recommendation 6, full text: “THAT baseline ground and surface water data be collected for an appropriate period of time, in order to ensure that comprehensive data is available.”

It’s B.C.-style soft legalese as part of Frack while Talk procedures, but no trust building, as in comprehensive baseline work must be carried out and completed. 

Recommendation 6 inevitably brings on especially B.C. best practices, as announced and complied with by the Yukon government. Those nowhere and never have included comprehensively concluded baseline water testing.

There is reason and logic to it. Alberta, Pennsylvania, British Columbia are examples, which will include the Yukon with frack procedures already permitted and initiated.

Industry-controlled regulators claim especially high levels of methane toxicity in the water of fracked regions are supposedly naturally occurring and pre-existing. 

Recommendation 10 recommends requiring to make public the frack chemicals. 

The entire 25-page frack report hides Fracfocus by making no single mention of this centrepiece of best practice regulations.

There is no excuse. Duty of care aside, on several occasions I had made sure all the committee members and legislature audience regulars are aware.

It is almost certain that the Fracfocus chemical disclosure registry will in time be implemented, as it is in place across North America, including in B.C., Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Fracfocus is a Kafkaesk masterpiece of deception and nihilism.

It requires disclosure reports, but not until 30 days after frack operations have ended and all specific individual compound disclosures are voluntary.

Medical associations complain that Fracfocus pushes back even those patients’ rights, disclosure obligations, legal remedies and helpful liabilities that existed before Fracfocus.

Herding everybody into establishing a narrow single-issue regulatory focus of water management really manages control of communities that in truth face broad destructive impacts (the Yukon government calls it Yukon Water Strategy, 2014).

It does so by diluting effective resistance against destroying the fullness of natural and economic life support systems.

Yukoners Concerned about Oil and Gas Exploration/Development, but especially Don Roberts, accommodated this government strategy by overplaying the message track: “It’s all about the water.”

Mr. Roberts never exposed or rejected Fracfocus.

Recommendation 11, full text: “THAT research be conducted to demonstrate whether well integrity can prevent migration of liquids or gases in the long term.”

Such research is not available. Supporting these recommendations retells government’s misleading statements, which can only get us fracked.

During the January 2014 Yukon legislature presentations/hearings, University of Alberta Prof. Bernhard Mayer had expressed doubt on industry claims regarding well integrity.

The Merchants of Doubt chutzpah by which his talk hid reality and statistics of the rate of well failures was remarkable.

The author of Sustainable Fossil Fuel, Mark Jaccard, a former advisor to former prime minister Stephen Harper, together with Rick Chalaturnyk, Royal Dutch Shell’s face for leaky carbon storage drilling, led the Merchants of (false) Doubt charge during the hearings.

Guaranteed frack harms were hidden consistently behind fixable or to-be-regulated “risks” by silver-tongued charmers with mediocre science credentials throughout the hearing.

There was frequent applause from all MLAs and the NGO crowd that had included Yukoners Concerned executives.

Synergy Alberta frack recruiting methods were explained and anticipated by short video docs on world-leading fracture engineer Tony Ingraffea that I had embedded into a PPT (http:// goo.gl/Oy8CtZ ).

During this Yukoners Concerned PPT presentation to the committee in October 2013, I had alerted the fracking committee members specifically to the Mayer/Jaccard type sleight-of-hand by carefully unpacking it.

In the PPT video material, fracture engineer Dr. Ingraffea strongly emphasized that engineers never use the word “prevent” when it comes to well failures, especially of frack wells.

His professional and poignant advice was critical, yet was totally suppressed and censored out from the report that Yukoners Concerned unfortunately endorses.

Recommendation #12 deals with air quality baseline testing as fraudulently as #6 does to water.

Merchants of Doubt piece #13 recommends research on greenhouse gases’ impact but ignores the U. of Colorado report with total mass measurement data of fugitive emissions of about nine per cent in a Utah frack field I had referred to and linked to in the Yukoners Concerned PPT.

I had pointed out how essential it is to include research such as the one of the U. of Colorado in the face of frack PR that to this day paints as outlier a well-known Cornell University study on the climate impact of methane emissions.

The remaining 16 frack implementations are mostly filler and fluff that provide a false sense of security while being screwed, diverting attention from the killer portion that has holes big enough to literally drive through frack truck loads by the millions.

Mr. Roberts’ letter is somewhat compromised in its credibility by letting off the hook the opposition parties which have underwritten the report and its 21 pro-frack recommendations.

It is what led to a highly deceptive Yukon Oil and Gas Act (2015 amended Yukon Oil and Gas Act) voted for by all parties, with the NDP failing its responsibility as official Opposition caucus that commanded resources to at least know and express what is going on.

What kind of silliness is at play trying to stop a wrong, while giving assistance to all its surrounding support limbs? After five years of fracking danger, the word disobedience, in civil disobedience, has not yet been learned.

Peter Becker is a Whitehorse energy consultant.


Monday, 3 October 2016

Fragmented words fracture the land ( Whitehorse Star Oct. 3, 2016 Comment )

Fragmented words fracture the land ( Whitehorse Star Oct. 3, 2016 Comment )

Is Premier Darrell Pasloski being duplicitous on a carbon tax? Nothing new there.

I have pointed it out over years in the Star and syndicated columns (yukonblogger).

But, unlike recent commentaries on his cabinet discussions by Liz Hanson and Sandy Silver, I didn’t let the premier get away with his consistent understating of the ecological and economic harms of a carbon tax. 

A carbon tax or price has never succeeded to work against emissions, as it had been designed by PR firms of the oil industry to depress renewables and subsidize emission increases with money and false language. (See also IPCC report part 3 as well as leading energy economists, journalists and climate modellers.)

It is educational to take a look at Synergy Alberta, an unregistered oil and gas financed and staffed lobby group, of which for example the Pembina Institute had been a member organization (exposed by the author in 2014), that manages community consultations with psychological crowd control or recruiting methods.

The premier gets to cash in on public opinion, which is learning that the abstract “carbon price” locks in complex business deals, with a title that spells “not transparency.”

The weird non-language of it sounds different for a reason to a plain vanilla propane tax or perhaps a motor sport racing fuel tax.

At the same time, together with carbon pricers from the opposition parties and environmental NGOs, he gets to hold the door open for the frackers who want the “carbon tax”, as it is roughly identical with the “social licence” to expand pollution, debt, carbon off-set speculation, structural unemployment and injustice.

On July 30, 2012, Chris Turner observed in the Canadian Marketing magazine: “Oil industry executives like to talk about ‘the social licence to operate’”. And green-washers eat it up. 

Corporatist think tanks figured out that mentioning the “social licence” provides it, irrespectively of stating nay or yay to somebody having one.

It happens simply by downgrading the threshold of people’s agreement or democratic approval or refusal thereof into therapeutic mush words.

In a lighter moment, perhaps, just listen, really listen, to the oil-drumbeat of the pipeline coalition of Alberta Premier Rachel Notley, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, and B.C. Premier Christy Clark that is coming through 24/7 on the CBC and other corporatist media.

Or listen to Rex Tillerson, Exxon Mobile’s CEO, who announced Oct. 7, 2015, “It’s just the right moment to introduce carbon taxes.”

Like a boxer in a rigged match, the premier may poke well in setting up to lose a carbon tax fight over a federally mandated carbon tax. Whereas a serious no to carbon pricing based on renewable energy initiatives and credible carbon accounting is bound to win out. 

Pointing out model carbon pricing of B.C. is methodically exempting Encana’s emissions would help an honest and legally effective argument (B.C. Auditor General report 2013).

It’s double-dealing all around by the Yukon Party on carbon taxes, and the NDP and Liberals on fracking.

All three are militantly united in hiding guaranteed fracking harms, such as water pollution, behind the uncertainty of “risk” language.

The point of converting scientifically established certain damage into the uncertainty of “risk” is to falsely suggest regulations for what can’t be regulated and therefore should have a moratorium.

The Yukon Conservation Society (YCS) consistently recommends “robust regulations”, unfortunately thereby softening up evidence against fracking.

It had largely endorsed the draft 2015 Yukon Oil and Gas Act (YOGA ) by responding “Agreed” to eight out of 11 proposals in the online consultation. 

The fundamental and surreal dissociation of the YOGA to the fracking problem is not rejected by YCS nor Yukoners Concerned About Oil and Gas Exploration/Development.

(I had warned against the leg-hold trap of fracking out of conventional drill language all through the frack committee process and its 21 best practices oriented pro-frack recommendations.)

Along those spineless carbon pricing lines, NDP and Liberal MLAs have voted together with the Yukon Party for the December 2015 YOGA that continues and entrenches the abolishment of the oil and gas veto right of the Kaska First Nation on their land in southeast Yukon.

Foreseeably the act, which hides away fracking completely, forced oversight bodies like the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board to deal falsely with brute force area fracking as spot drilling into a conventional reservoir.

The latter is very different to the only one decade-old current standard of unconventional drilling, HVSFLL.

Such a parallel reality version of environmental assessment and administrative oversight is already happening re. EFLO’s Kotaneelee drill permits and re. the China-National-Offshore-Oil-Corp./Northern-Cross-Yukon shale fracking exploration at Eagle Plains.

Checkerboard-style build-outs across large shale rock formations with high-volume, slickwater fracking from long laterals on multi-well pads is a necessary mouthful that fracture engineer Dr. Antony Ingraffea, skyped in to the Yukon Beringia Interpretive Centre last Thursday, apologized for. 

Proven conventional oil and gas reserves do not exist anymore in Yukon according to Yukon Geologiocal Survey-commissioned studies such as the one by Petrel & Robertson, July 2012. 

Any oil and gas extraction development from now has to mean “carpet bombing” of southeast Yukon, the Whitehorse Trough, the Peel or Eagle Plains. 

“Carpet bombing” fittingly is the industry jargon for HVSFLL. The purpose of supporting the 2015 redoing of oil and gas regulations speaks for itself.

While committing to carbon pricing, the NDP and Liberals, together with the Yukon Party, do not commit to a single kWh of new green energy, not to a single wind turbine, not to a single EV turbo-charge station nor comprehensive renewable energy source framework for private and public investment.

Armed with the freshly amended act in their pockets, the NDP or Liberals in government could continue to pay lip service against fracking while simultaneously forcing it through remote country backdoors on to citizens who typically are not geologists or petroleum engineers.

Yukoners Concerned had organized last week’s well-attended session.

Ingraffea, a well-known Cornell University professor, pointed out the YOGA never even mentions “shale” or “fracturing”, “conventional” or “unconventional”, not in any form.

He explicitly responded to the author in agreement on the deceptive character of the YOGA, which, in Ingraffea’s review, could only be matched on the negative scale by Texas regulations.

Peter Becker is a Whitehorse energy consultant.


Friday, 9 September 2016

Electoral and responsible gov’t. reforms since 1848 ( Comment Whse Star Sept. 9, 2016 )

Saturday, 16 July 2016

#Come off the "Love Train"

#Come off the "Love Train"

The Sanders campaign is not adequately aggressive in fighting back Clinton's vote stealing and cover ups of her racism from Iowa to Nevada, the Carolinas, Arizona to California, which is how the primaries were lost.

The psychological force of robust political ancestors, who struggled with verve and spirit for abolition, women's vote and worker rights, doesn't allow a demobilizing language, ranging from unwomanly sappy to academically flat, coming anywhere near of achieving power.

The fact basis in the reporting of independent and some mainstream media proved Hillary Clinton's policies are racist to the core, yet writers voices often lack the stirring, gutsy delivery in getting people to listen.

Largely unexploited is Clinton's pushing for today's segregation and black mass incarceration which she embarked upon as campaigner for Barry Goldwater's and Richard Nixon's racist Southern Strategy.

Some observers are sucked in by an almost pathological ability for deception, such as through her singing along in black churches. However, in a 1996 interview with journalist Scott Simon the 48 year old states: "I am very proud that I was a Goldwater girl."

Many well meaning commentators, with their sanitizing or misplaced respect in critiquing Clinton, fall short of offering clarity to the public on the basic factual context of her racism. A dangerous awareness gap opened up where Clinton's army of Progeys weaselled through (neoliberal phoneys dressing as progressives).

Leading civil rights advocate Michelle Alexander understood this would happen and wrote in The Nation on Feb. 10, 2016: "In short, there is such a thing as a lesser evil, and Hillary is not it." and:

"I am inclined to believe it would be easier to build a new party than to save the Democratic Party from itself." (An indication that a capable Jill Stein is doing the responsible thing.)

From racism that includes Clinton's Walmart economy, fracking climate bomb, deceptive free trade, racialized predatory lending and race based access-blockage to education/medicare.

From illegal wars and coups against Honduras, Libya, Iraq, Ukraine and risking nuclear war with her planned no-fly-zone attack against a Russian military that is legal and invited in Syria.

William Butler Yeats also knew something about vigor to fight evil.

Today's pacifist numbness echoes in the perhaps most haunting verse of a century in his poem Second Coming, which Yeats wrote 1919 under the impact still of World War 1 cataclysms:

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

The proclaimed choice between Clinton and Trump is a fiction that has one purpose, selling out the grassroots to Wall Street. Fact is, in current low voter turn out scenarios few people switch between the symbiotic Blue and Red accomplices, many are demobilized not to vote at all.

Bernie Sanders has endorsed Clinton but he and the super delegates are still free, or even accountable, to reconsider the creepy reality that is closing in on them of Clinton and Trump actually supplementing each other, and give her the boot in Philly.

Sunday, 10 July 2016

Wall Street and Clinton are angry at Sanders, they have reason to worry

Wall Street and Clinton are angry at Sanders, they have reason to worry

Wall Street and Clinton are angry at Sanders because he has not endorsed her. They have reasons to worry when millions of Americans will descend on the Philadelphia Democratic Party convention end of July.

Just like Chicago in 1968 the people are coming to Philadelphia in 2016 to bring justice and end war. Their arguments are fair and persuasive making super delegates honest in nominating Sanders to run for President.

#Philly 2016: VOTE SANDERS AGAINST clinTonPP

Saturday, 9 July 2016

Hot Philly, Tweet: VOTE SANDERS AGAINST clinTonPP

Hot Philadelphia Convention, Tweet and Retweet: VOTE SANDERS AGAINST clinTonPP

Then what?
Jill Stein as VP candidate on the Sanders for President Ticket may be the most realistic option.

Friday, 8 July 2016

A Flip-Flop too far — Rusty Revolution skills let Clinton get away with TPP?

A Flip-Flop too far — Rusty Revolution skills let Clinton get away with TPP?

General George Washington did not make that mistake when unannounced during the night of Dec. 25-26, 1776 he crossed the Delaware and attacked foreign mercenaries of the colonizer. 

Following the analogy, under Investor State Dispute Settlement provisions, ISDS, of so called free trade deals, despotic secret offshore tribunals extort moneys from governments to punish the will of the people and override their laws. 

Practically Obama's and Clinton’s TPP agenda removes law making powers from Congress and other countries’ parliaments and transfers legislative authority to extra-legal or illegal litigators of multi-nationals.

Philadelphia 2016, a deja vu of Chicago 1968? Raw pressure from millions of Americans could bear down on the Democratic Party convention and its super delegates to come to their senses and nominate Bernie Sanders to run for President.

There is nothing to be gained by clinging to more of temporary lip service against the TPP by Hillary Clinton, until, during or following the conclusion of platform committee meetings on July 8/9 2016. 

Many excellent writers and activists have delivered compelling but perhaps ill focussed or somewhat premature testimony that has tipped off the Clinton campaign which now understands that people mean to fight.

As much as still possible the heavy hitting needs to converge on the goal of Sanders for President during the two weeks between wrapped up party platform committee and convention.

So that the phoney and rigged committee process becomes ammunition not for Clinton and Wall Street, but in favour of the people and of Sanders’ nomination. 

Not fighting this one out to the wire, not collecting knowledge from loss or win of learning strength in battle completion and up close, also means to put the first coffin nail of weakness into the next campaign to follow the path of Sanders, FDR and Henry Wallace.

Unfortunately some of those who write, talk and hopefully think are too timid to face reality from a grassroots vantage point. That doesn’t give them a right for massaging the wider public to swallow Clinton betrayals even before she might be nominated.

The Progies (neoliberal phonies who dress up as progressives) problem is for real but it should not be expanded artificially. True activists inspire and do not become tail-lights and sell-outs for a movement. 

Senior Clinton campaigner Senator Warren, who owns a so far untainted integrity, just delivered exactly a THIRD Flip-Flop, this time against TPP, which no doubt will be made official by Clinton shortly, only as long as it serves her of course.

Bernie Sanders has kept a cool head and wisely focusses on the convention and run up where betrayals during the platform talks, after much campaign fraud against the majority in the party, are to be judged by the membership citizenry inside and outside of the hall.

FIRST Flip-Flop away from supporting TPP (and Fourth Flip-Flop to come) — On Jan. 28, 2016 the Huffington Post’s Robert Naiman referred to commonly held knowledge:

“In an interview from Davos with Bloomberg TV on January 20, Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue, a top lobbyist for the pro-corporate-power Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP] agreement, assured viewers that if Hillary Clinton wins the Presidential election Clinton will support the TPP, even though she opposes it now.”

SECOND Flip-Flop — On June 24, 2016 the Clinton team votes unanimously for the TPP in the Democratic Party platform committee. 

THIRD Flip-Flop — Senior Clinton campaigner Elizabeth Warren’s Senate speech against TPP on Tue. July 5, 2016.

FOURTH Flip-Flop — With TPP architect/facilitator Hillary Clinton, who already had pushed for undemocratic fast tracking of the TPP (against the Senate vote of Sanders) as President there would be a bipartisan ratification of the TPP.


Peter Becker is a Whitehorse energy consultant.

Friday, 1 July 2016

Sanders worries Trump who likes Clinton

Sanders worries Trump who likes Clinton

Clinton plays by Trump’s "crooked" Hillary frame, whereas Sanders follows his and the peoples’ plan.

At this point very hypothetical odds are fairly even between Clinton and Trump.

This is despite him understandably holding back so there would be no last minute upset in favour of the Sanders he is afraid of.

Accordingly, on the eve of the California primaries, both, Clinton and Trump chickened out of debating Bernie Sanders.

Unfortunately progressive and liberal opinion leaders are too timid to face the realities of conflict with false populism. 

One by one they are readying themselves, and unfairly also massaging the wider public, to swallow more betrayals from Clinton against ordinary people. Latest example: TPP flipflop of June 24, 2016 during platform talks.

Bernie Sanders right now needs a much more robust support than what he is receiving from those who write, talk and hopefully think.

Unless Sanders becomes nominated in Philadelphia as Democratic Party candidate, Trump owns the economic card and, surprise, has been handed decisively the democratic rights card by Clinton's TPP about-turn. 

With impeccable timing only days before Brexit and Clinton's overconfidence in reasserting her never seriously shaken bow to TPP, Trump doubled down against undemocratic free-trade deals. 

He correctly invoked that TPP and NAFTA are unlawful, anti-market-trade and protectionist in handing the taxation privileges of Kings to cartels like Big Pharma, Big Oil and Wall Street, so they can control, fleece and starve people.

"Hillary Clinton has also been the biggest promoter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which will ship millions more of our jobs overseas – and give up Congressional power to an international foreign commission."

That's right, he has clued in on Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions that follow the NAFTA Chapter 11 Investment template. 

Multinationals are legislating, by extorting from the people severe financial penalties levied against democratic laws they don’t like, in illegal offshore arbitration panels. 

Like the TPP, the Atlantic free-trade deal, TIPP, has another NAFTA Chapter 11 copycat provision. ISDS is what free-trade is all about. Clearly without ISDS free-trade deals are not logical, for better or worse. To hide this fact there is much filler fluff.

It is true because removals or adjustments of trade tariffs, without an undemocratic agenda, are simply added on to GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs).

Think about it, phoney free-trade deals in the November election will be much more commandeering than even with Brexit. 

Trump fires straight back the ammunition Clinton hands him without even needing anymore his trademark distortions.

Building a grassroots movement is great, but don't people agree the nomination fight is over when its over after the super delegates vote, and not before? They may be corrupt, I grant everybody that, but they might also get more scared by the hour? 

Without seizing this very moment the opportunity for an FDR - Bernie Sanders kind of a Presidency may deflect away into space, not to return in a 1000 years.

A lot of good can happen in a month's time especially if well meaning media are not throwing in the towel prematurely and not lose courage to give Sanders for President a fair chance.

A battle can be lost, but what are chances next time, if this fight is not carried down to the wire, measuring out the opponent close enough so one might win or get hurt? Predictabilities have gone out the window for good.

Brexit occurred even without blunders and betrayals on the Clinton scale.
Here is what will happen, come November, if the super delegates in Philadelphia are not (symbolically) persuasively whacked in the head.

What they need to be made to understand, by hook or by crook, Jim Ruth managed to put straight in the Washington Post on June 28, 2016, and it is this.

Outside of the groupthink of Washington beltway pundits, with their rigged Democratic Party primaries, Hillary Clinton has become unelectable. 

It is an unpleasant fact on the road ahead, much closer to the earth than the academic ivory towers some live, think and feed themselves in.

Walter Benjamin in 1936 wrote The Storyteller, a tract in which he defends the importance of an understanding out of ones experience, against spoon-fed and emotionally flat information.

Then there is William Butler Yeats who also knew something about vigour to fight evil.

The current drama is perhaps best captured by the haunting lines out of his poem Second Coming, which Yeats wrote under the impact still of WW1 cataclysms:

"The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity"

Those who are against the people keep advertising the lesser evil and have facilitated an ever growing greater evil. These neoliberals are forcing the very adult kind of a paradox, that with sadness and resolve Jim Ruth expresses.

In their heart of hearts people know that one can fight enemies, but only after traitors are dealt with.

First line of Ruth's so far unheeded warning in The Washington Post:
"No Donald Trump campaign buttons or bumper stickers for me."

Ruth's last word: 
"We hate Donald Trump, but he might just get our vote.” 

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

Brexit boost for Sanders, set back for Clinton


Brexit boost for Sanders, set back for Clinton and Free Trade

A slap in the face for those who support Hillary Clinton instead of Bernie Sanders to beat Donald Trump who claims to be against the Trans-Pacific Partnership (During Democratic Party platform talks on June 24, 2016 the Clinton campaign once again supported the TPP, after she had talked against it on the campaign trail). 

Why? Unless Sanders becomes nominated in Philadelphia as Democratic candidate, Trump now owns the economic card and, surprise, has been handed the democratic rights card by Clinton decisively. 

Building a grassroots movement is great, but don't you agree the nomination fight is over when its over after the super delegates vote, and not before? They may be corrupt, I grant you that, but they might also get more scared by the hour? 

The opportunity for a Henry Wallace - Bernie Sanders kind of a President may deflect into space not to return in a 1000 years! A lot can happen in a month's time especially if indy media and avantgarde are not throwing in the towel prematurely, not losing courage to give Sanders a fair chance for President.

A battle can be lost, but what are chances next time if this fight is not carried down to the wire, measuring out the opponent close enough so one might win or get hurt? Predictabilities have gone out the window for good.

With impeccable timing only days before Brexit and Clinton's disastrous overconfidence in reasserting her never seriously shaken bow to TPP, Trump doubled down against unlawful and chaotic free trade deals:

"Hillary Clinton has also been the biggest promoter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which will ship millions more of our jobs overseas – and give up Congressional power to an international foreign commission."

That's right, he has clued in on Investor State Dispute Settlement, multinationals legislating by extorting from the people severe financial penalties against democratic laws in illegal offshore arbitration panels.

Think about it, phoney free trade deals in the November US election will be much more commandeering than with Brexit. Trump fires straight back the ammunition Clinton hands him without even needing anymore his trademark distortions.

Thus, in the complicit, neoliberal process legitimate civic and economic grievances are transformed into chaotic reasoning, irrational racism and anti-immigrant sentiment, all of which are coming to a head.

Brexit happened without blunders and betrayals on the Clinton scale.
There are other lenses into discussing and learning from Brexit, but undemocratic free trade is a constant, not chaotic one, and it works without platitudes and slogans.  

The right-wing agenda of Brexit figurehead Boris Johnson, similar to Trump, syndicates well in much of the corporate-controlled mainstream media. The Lexit (left-wing exit) campaign never gained traction.

Neither one is the editorial outlook of the British Guardian. Nick Dearden, on April 16, seemed to have his finger on people’s pulse months before the vote:

“The problem for the [Britain-visiting] U.S. president is selling TTIP [Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership] the EU-U.S. equivalent of EU-Canada free trade deal Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement – CETA – at the same time as trying to warn against the dangers of Brexit.

“This is a tough task because TTIP has been a godsend for Brexit campaigners, who argue the deal is a major reason to cut loose from Brussels.

It's true that TTIP is a symbol for all that is wrong with Europe: dreamed up, by corporate lobbyists, TTIP is less about trade and more about giving big business sweeping new powers over our society.

It is a blueprint for deregulation and privatization. As such, it makes a good case for Brexit.”

“CETA is probably dead,” according to the Huffington Post and Christopher Sands from the Centre for Canadian Studies at Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies.

Lame-duck British Prime Minister David Cameron is an ideological free trader who many in the EU and in Britain are happy to get rid off as upside of the Brexit disaster.

He was the only allied leader left in Europe for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Barack Obama to push the ISDS (Investor State Dispute Settlement) by which multinationals can de facto overrule Germany’s and France’s frack ban e.g.) into the Atlantic free trade, CETA and TIPP.

On the artificial stage of the free trade show, Cameron, Trudeau, Clinton and Obama have a point. The Atlantic free trade ISDS, a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Chapter 11 copycat provision, is what free trade is all about; without it, no deal is needed. The rest is filler fluff.

It is true because removals or adjustments of trade tariffs, without an undemocratic agenda, are simply added on to GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs).

Cameron’s pro-fracking, pro-carbon tax and carbon trade stance against renewable policies are on the Brexit bill.

So is the austerity starving of the Greeks, if anybody paid attention to Boris Johnson’s sweeping tirades.

Brexit is an EU identity crisis as much as it is a British one. One part still learns that empires die more slowly than they are born, and the other shouldn’t aspire to become one.

Today, the pro-peace and anti-corporate-rule origins of the EU are widely forgotten.

The project Europe originally had two French fathers, entrepreneur Jean Monnet and early post-war foreign minister Robert Schumann.

They had made a persuasive argument to the socialist/conservative mix of French leadership and conservative German chancellor Konrad Adenauer. The core idea the two had dreamt up, already between world wars and initiated from 1950 onward, succeeded like this.

French and German steel and coal industries were to be so closely co-overseen by both governments that war preparations against each other had forever become physically impossible.

Strong labour rights, civic foundations and democratic controls of corporations across the board were core positions of all six founding nations guaranteeing peace, which was laid down in the 1957 Treaty of Rome.

The EU had been founded on peace and democracy, not economics, in explicit and intentional opposition to always closely-linked corporatism and militarism. It also turned out to be a good plan for prosperity.

The brittling of EU principles and cohesion, in shape of EU-NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) package deals to Eastern European countries as measure of a renewed anti-Russian cold war escalation, had started long before Brexit and the crushing of Greece.

In the fields of Ramstein, a small German town close to the French border with cheerful timber frame houses, one of the largest drone bases plays a role in killing children in Pakistan. EU weapons manufacturers export death throughout the world.

Early poison in the heart of the EU became an event that is remembered as the 1973 Basel Committee process.

Quasi as neoliberal kickstarter publicly-owned National Banks were secretively privatized into rogue financier operations with an innocuous title change as so-called central banks.

It was a long game kind of a profiteering racket, and to have eventually devastating results for democracies and economies of the kind we are observing now.

The Big Short, a theme-related docudrama movie, is guaranteed to knock the reader’s socks off.

Solid awareness and honesty about EU failures to be reformed and EU successes made Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and British Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn perhaps the most effective Remain campaigners.

This is despite problems Landslide Corbyn has with the disloyal and now completely unelectable Blairites in the House of Commons, some of whom apparently did more harm than good to the Remain campaign.

These neoliberal fossils of so-called New Labour still worship Tony Blair, the alleged war-criminal and sworn Corbyn enemy.

Sir Ken Macdonald, a former UK director of public prosecutions, and other legal heavies are working toward prosecuting Blair.

Filmmaker and journalist Paul Mason’s column headline in the Guardian has a message to the forlorn Blairists in parliament: “Corbyn delivered the Labour vote for remain – so let’s get behind him.”

Perhaps to be remembered as a hero of political tragicomedy, David Cameron had called the Brexit referendum.

His fate energizes democratic populism as well as semi-fascist movements together with storm warnings for neoliberal elitists like Trudeau, like Obama solidifying his negative legacy and Hillary Clinton (neoliberal equals colonialism under market disguise).

All four seem strong contenders, past and ongoing ones, in the satirical Darwin Awards competitions that recognize outstanding achievements of successful self-elimination from social and political evolution.

(There is a related story on Clinton’s road out of the presidential election in the Whitehorse Star archives or at yukonblogger.)

Peter Becker is a Whitehorse energy consultant.

Friday, 17 June 2016

Clintonomics created Trump; only Sanders can beat him - Whitehorse Star Column June 17, 2016

Clintonomics created Trump; only Sanders can beat him - Whitehorse Star Column June 17, 2016

It is mathematical, after all.

Neither U.S. Democratic primary candidate Hillary Clinton with now 2,200, nor challenger Bernie Sanders, with just over 1,800, can reach the required 2,384 delegate votes before 712 super delegates vote during the last week of July.

Which is long ways off in politics. Currently, Clinton is favoured by 580 and Sanders by 50 of those appointed 712, give or take a few.

Republican and Democratic party executives long have had a contract to operate as one party when it comes to crushing popular nonconformists like Dennis Kucinich in 2008, or now Sanders.

The powerful bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, with its mandate and arsenal of undemocratic manipulation tools to sideline popular candidates, is only one of their instruments.

Presumed Republican candidate Donald Trump who, like other sitting or aspiring dictators, already talks about the presidency in terms of a one-branch government, without acknowledging democratic institutions like Congress, the Senate, the U.S. Supreme Court, future elections or state governments, is a game changer.

He might yet put the fear of God into the elitists in the Democratic Party, such as the appointed super delegates. They typically prefer a Republican president over a populist one of their own.

However, the FBI’s criminal investigation of Clinton may also take her down in a heartbeat.

This is what the premature or fake nomination of Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate by The Associated Press in collaboration (leaked) with the Clinton campaign was all about. On the eve of the California primary, it was timed for a massive vote suppression and distortion.

Ordinary folks and especially young Sanders supporters tend to sacrifice more for the effort than wealthier Clinton supporters in the lengthy, time-consuming primary lineups.

The lie that it was all over made some stay at work or home, and unfairly gave extra percentages to Clinton.

Cautiously put, Clinton is one of the most negatively viewed public figures across the U.S.

Unappreciated by political experts’ tunnel vision inside the Washington Beltway fish tank, in the general public she loses against the straight-shooting Sanders. 

And, importantly, she does much less well than Senator Sanders against Trump.

Polling her against the unpredictable conman Trump is a close thing at this point.

But when the chips are down, her disingenuous air and double-talking track record might come up short. That’s especially when debating this so far very intuitive and successful knife-fighter, who only bloodied 17 Republican primary contenders.

The danger for a national and international stage that the Philadelphia Democratic Party convention will have to deal with is a clear-cut one.

All the oxygen of the entire 2016 presidential primaries consists of breathing anti-establishment sentiment.

It was sowed in decades by neoliberal promoters, for Wall Street crime, militarism, stopping access to health care or education and for fracking the climate, like hawkish Hillary Clinton.

Testimony in 2004 by Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, from an interview with veteran journalist Bill Moyers, has recently gone viral.

It concerned Clinton, who flip-flopped on the forever returning bankruptcy bill. It starves and milks poor people by forbidding them bankruptcy, which, as First Lady, she had opposed.

Warren: “This is a bill that is like a vampire; it will not die. There is a lot of money behind it.”

Moyers: “Bill [Clinton], her husband had vetoed it.”

Warren: “Her husband had vetoed it very much at her urging.”

Moyers: “And?”

Warren: “She voted in favour of it ... she has taken money from the [bank] groups and, more to the point, she worries about them as a constituency.”

Warren closeup saw Clinton’s lack of moral fibre as she had face-to-face, comprehensively as law professor, briefed the law-educated First Lady on the consumer credit industry.

The big banks attack freedom with a version of debt bondage by astronomic interest rates on payday loans that are even more extreme than in Canada, for example.

Senator Warren’s June 9 endorsement for primary candidate Clinton gave pause to reflect on deeply corrupted mentalities.

Warren’s up to that point untarnished record is recognized as founder of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and as a long-time political ally of Sanders.

Jill Stein, the Green Party presumptive presidential candidate, knows upholding integrity and accountability is a long game. 

On June 9, interviewed on Democracy Now, she cut to the bone of the Democratic Party’s dilemma: “We are rushing towards war with Hillary Clinton, who has a track record."

“And on climate, H.C. established an office to promote fracking around the world, while Secretary of State. So the terrible things that we expect from Donald Trump, we’ve actually already seen from H.C.”

“The lesser evil very much makes inevitable the greater evil, because people don’t come out to vote for a politician that is throwing them under the bus ... they need you to be afraid of them, because they are not for you.”

Self-appointed town crier and false populist Trump quite possibly cannot lose if the only anti-establishment candidate of both parties, Senator Sanders, is pushed out by continued fraudulent manipulation.

Vote suppression as in California and New York, vote counting fraud like in Iowa, biased super delegates and unbalanced sleaze journalism are running rampant since the Democratic Party primaries started converging toward a Trumpastrophy.

Preventing totalitarian disaster could turn out to be the patriotic and legal obligation super delegates will eventually have to answer for.

Their vote for Sanders further will offer them opportunity to correct and atone for already orchestrated election fraud.

Calling to heel a rising populist movement with deep American roots is useless.

It will work no more than a newborn will go back into the mother’s womb in case its behaviour is not pleasing to everyone.

Once Clinton would be finally anointed, irretrievable chaos will have started.

Sanders supporters, except for a few, will not vote for Trump, but experience shows that insulted and backstabbed people are electorally demobilized and stay home.

It’s a fact that elections are decided not by winning over votes but by turning out the support base.

Bernie Sanders has no problem there, as Clinton supporters are left of Clinton on many accounts: militarism, her Honduras or Libya regime changes as well as a renewed cold war encircling of China and Russia, medicare suppression, financialization, undemocratic free trade deals and unprecedented anti-Mexican deportations that legitimize Trump’s racism.

History bears out that standing on principle improves a people’s practical survival chances often more than shortsighted tactical betrayals.

President John F. Kennedy, who set a high standard for presidents to come, learned and understood that.

With the Trump/Clinton symbiosis, we may be rapidly entering into a dynamic of history JFK once had wisely warned against.

The realization that militarist and imperialist advisors had gulled him to escalate aggression against Cuba and Vietnam made him more mindful and inspired him to initiate the international Alliance for Progress.

On its first anniversary in March 1962, JFK poignantly highlighted social justice and democratic rights: “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Peter Becker is Whitehorse energy consultant.

By Peter Becker